{
 "public_id": "AIR-2026-0113",
 "incident_id": "2026-05-brazil-labor-court-galileu-injection",
 "date_disclosed": "2026-05-13",
 "date_occurred": null,
 "title": "Hidden prompt injection in a Brazilian labour-court petition attempted to steer the Galileu judicial AI",
 "class": "in_the_wild",
 "attack_surface": "enterprise_assistant",
 "initial_vector": "indirect_prompt_injection_document",
 "agent_capability_abused": [
  "document_ingestion",
  "draft_generation_for_judiciary"
 ],
 "target_product": "Galileu (Brazilian labour courts AI)",
 "target_vendor": "Brazilian Labour Court system",
 "autonomy_level": "assistant",
 "impact_realized": false,
 "impact_type": [
  "judicial_process_manipulation"
 ],
 "blast_radius": "one petition before the 3rd Labour Court of Parauapebas; systemic risk to AI-assisted judicial drafting",
 "cve": [],
 "taxonomy": {
  "owasp_asi": [
   "ASI01"
  ],
  "mitre_atlas": [],
  "labels": [
   "prompt_injection_in_the_wild",
   "judicial_ai",
   "detected_and_blocked",
   "adversarial_litigant"
  ]
 },
 "defense_present": "Galileu injection detection",
 "defense_bypassed": false,
 "fix_shipped": "Galileu alerted the judge and blocked the hidden content from processing",
 "primary_sources": [
  "https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/1497"
 ],
 "verified_quote": "Galileu, an AI tool used by Brazil's labor courts, reportedly detected hidden instructions embedded in an initial petition before the 3rd Labor Court of Parauapebas.",
 "confidence": "medium",
 "notes": "AI Incident Database incident 1497. The sole cited source is the TRT-4 court portal; the quote is taken instead from the AIID incident record in the official AIID data snapshot. Rare documented case of prompt injection attempted by a real litigant against a government AI system - and of the defence working.",
 "risk_category": "legal_ip",
 "risk_secondary": [],
 "risk_subcategory": "Breach of Contract / TOS Violation Enablement",
 "risk_sub_secondary": [],
 "ai_entity": "generative",
 "agency": "agent_acted",
 "agency_debatable": true,
 "agency_reason": "the judicial AI ingested the petition; the steer was detected",
 "vector_family": "indirect_prompt_injection",
 "vector_detail": "indirect_prompt_injection_document",
 "guardrail_kind": [
  "input_classifier"
 ],
 "guardrail_outcome": "silent",
 "xrefs": {
  "aiid": [
   1497
  ],
  "atlas": [],
  "cve": [],
  "ghsa": []
 },
 "primary_asi": "ASI01",
 "agent_framework": "unknown",
 "model_provider": "unknown",
 "model_name": "",
 "detection_mechanism": "unknown",
 "tool_access": "unknown",
 "financial_loss_band": "unknown",
 "eai_category": "policy_drift",
 "eai_domain": "governance",
 "eai_secondary": [
  "confused_deputy"
 ],
 "eai_reason": "subcategory: Breach of Contract / TOS Violation Enablement",
 "asi_curated": [
  "ASI01"
 ],
 "asi_scope": "in_scope",
 "asi_provenance": "curated",
 "asi_reason": "curated: ASI01",
 "submitted_by": "EAI Internal"
}